donwload site

what's webhard?
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud should be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only should be in a folder.

You need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.